Logo

Valentines Day Ecards

LA TIMES: CATHERINE HARDWICKE ON BRYCE DALLAS HOWARD

Posted August 9th, 2009 By: Evie 11 Comments »

The Los Angeles Times has an interesting interview with Catherine Hardwicke from the red carpet at the Teen Choice Awards tonight. Catherine talks about how Bryce was offered the role of Victoria first, a little about her upcoming project Hamlet and about the fame that has enveloped Rob and Kristen.

“Twilight” director Catherine Hardwicke told us at the Teen Choice Awards that Bryce Dallas Howard was an actress they initially wanted to cast as the redhead vampire Victoria. But, according to Hardwicke, the “Twilight” role was probably too small for Bryce back then. It then went to Rachel Lefevre, a less proven newcomer. But as everyone knows, Bryce has now replaced Rachel as Victoria, for whatever reason — bad timing, another movie — that you choose to believe. Hey, you don’t think they made the “Eclipse” role bigger to interest Bryce?

Anyway, Cathy’s new “crazy modern” thriller film based on Hamlet” sounds pretty darn cool. And there’s gonna be great music too. You gotta love the idea of Hamlet as a young Kurt Cobain.

And it’s sweet that Catherine feels badly about Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson becoming such huge overnight sensations and being thrust into the limelight the way the poor kids have been. “I mean, part of me feels kind of guilty because they are both such indie spirits,” Hardwicke reveals. “They are really artists, they like making meaningful art, interesting art.”

SOURCE

Did it surprise you that Bryce was offered the role first? What do you think about Catherine feeling bad for Rob and Kristen?







Read More About:
Filed under: News Blog TA Toolbar: Download Here
advertisement
  • Ashleigh

    I think that it’s Bull that she turned down the part at first cause it wasn’t “big” wought for her. And now that its the third movie into it and it has blowen up and gets her name known that she wants in, Not Right in my Book, She wasn’t that big of a actress to begin with, I had no idea who she was until about a few days ago, It just urks meto see people be so, selfish, but idk if thats the right word for it, like ego, not like ew what a horbile person, but more like greddy, I think thats what I’m looking for.

    To sum it up, I think thats totaly messed up, and Greddy. But I will wait to see how she dose. Hope she dose well is all I can say.

  • Inga

    I can understand why Bryce turned down the role in Twilight. She’s starred in many successful films like The Village, Lady in the water and Terminator: Salvation. The role of Victoria in Twilight was tiny compared to what she’s used to.

  • twilmom

    I like Catherine’s response the best so far, to me the other’s have been wish washy, polite and possibly coached, they may feel they have no choice. I like that she pointed out that she thought the role was too small for her.

    Well if the role was too small then, its too large now. I don’t care if she is a good actress, or a “nice” person, its not the point. More effort should have been put into keeping Rachelle.

    I look it like this, no I still can’t let this go, Bryce got this gift and it wasn’t just what she wanted(not big, glamorous or expensive enough) so she returned it. Now all her friends want or have the same thing, so she changed her mind. She stomped her way to dad and demanded he get it for her, now! (think Varuka Salt)

  • Danielle

    The role was not BIG ENOUGH for her??? OMG, thats so like, disgusting to hear, because she wasnt that big to begin with. no ones really heard of her until now, that i know of. theyve only heard of her father. ugh.

    of course she says yeas now, seeing how Rachelle is uber-famous bc of it and Eclipse is Vicorias biggest part.

    She officially sickens me.

  • http://twilightersanonymous.com/los-angeles-times-catherine-hardwicke-on-bryce-dallas-howard.html Ermie

    Actually, it did surprise me Bryce was offered the part first. ??? I love Catherine Hardwicke and I THINK she did a fantastic job on Twilight. It was done more like an Inde with a small budget. You can tell she truly cares for “her” people who are cast and I think she is right on about Rob and Kris. I know they will continue to do great no matter what roles they take on. I certainly will see movies they choose to act in.

  • http://twilightersanonymous Marianne

    oops, I bet Summit is cringing at her comment. If Bryce had read the three books available to her at the time she would have seen the part gets bigger as the story goes on. Ha.

    I still think her Dad has some part to play in this. Rob said that Ron Howard asked him to have a picture taken with him at the Oscar’s. I think he may be toying with possibly directing Breaking Dawn. That movie will have to be a big budget movie, or movies, and that is just up his alley now. He’s only done big huge movies lately soooo, that’s my theory.

    I just wish they all talked to eachother sooner and all this could have been avoided. “If” that’s what both parties wanted.

  • carrena

    Ron Howard is not thinking about directing “breaking dawn”. Just look at Ron Howard’s wikipedia or imdb page, he has like 4 movies in the next 3 years to make.

    And it really baffles me that people didn’t know who Bryce is. She was the lead in 2 M. Night Schamalayan movies. And in two blockbusters as love interests, on top of that an award winninng actress.

    I’ve known of her for the past 4 years or so.

  • miss_amanda

    For those of us who care about Rachelle, we can’t help but be upset hearing this new news that Bryce was originally offered the role for Victoria but thought it beneath her… because she was supposedly this big star… well, I’m sorry. Not to me.

    I didn’t know who she was (Bryce Dallas Howard) because I didn’t like either of those M. Night Schamalayan movies. Not my taste. I only put names to faces if they matter enough to me… and she did not matter to me.

    It’s only NOW that I recognize she was in Terminator: Salvation… her role wasn’t even that huge in that movie either.

    I’m still upset and haven’t gotten over it either. I know there’s nothing I can do to change anything. What’s done is done. But it doesn’t mean I have to like it.

    BASICALLY. I will miss Rachelle, I would prefer it was Rachelle, but even though I’m not jumping up and down for Bryce, I don’t think she’ll do a bad job. In fact, she better do a good job!! *shakes fist*

  • http://twilightersanonymous Marianne

    I don’t care what Wikipedia says about Ron Howard. It’s not that I dislike either him or Bryce, but if the part was too small for her back then, it’s suddenly big enough now? Sure it is, because of how hot and popular this franchise is. Rachelle was so totally committed and a huge fan herself.
    If I’m not familiar with Bryce as an actress it’s because of the movies she choose to be in, they were not something I would go to see, but I will see her in New Moon and hope she does a good job at playing the part of Victoria. That doesn’t mean I have to be happy about it, after all, what choice do we have.

  • Chris

    Mini post: It was great hearing Catherine give the real lo-down on the fact that Bryce was originally offered the part as Victoria but it “wasn’t big enough of a part” for her. Pishaw….ugh. More intense snarling going on in the forum. http://forum.twilightersanonymous.com/news-b2/la-times-catherine-hardwicke-on-bryce-dallas-howard/

    We’re being really bad-ish but at least we’re being honest. We even found a site that has t-shirts that say, “Rachell Lefevre is Victoria. Accept no substitutes”. We’re going to wear them on Nov 20th and cheer when Edward rips Bryce to shreds in Eclipse. Hey now…just being honest with the feelings. ya know? See you in the forum.

  • GJ

    Sorry, but I think some of you guys are just too young and thus just not the right audience to know Bryce Dallas Howard’s name. If Rachelle wasn’t in Twilight, you wouldn’t have known her name either. I already knew of her before Twilight from Swingtown.

    Personally, I think it’s sucks for ANY character to be recast in any show. However, I definitely know that Bryce has the acting chops to be in this movie, and she definitely has more of the dark and vengeful “look” than Rachelle. I feel bad for Rachelle, but I definitely think she put her own spin on the story to make Summit look evil. All of the other actors didn’t take on commitments that conflicted with the schedule. Why should the whole rehearsal schedule be rearranged for ONE person in an ensemble cast? It is ridiculously expensive to do so.

    That said, I wish everyone would get over the whole situation. Bryce will be in the movie, and it’s not like anyone would forgo seeing the movie just because Rachelle’s not in it. And don’t bash Bryce’s talent because you liked Rachelle better.

 

 

 
More in News Blog (4330 of 7413 articles)