Logo

Valentines Day Ecards

TA TALKS BACK: WHAT AN ADAPTATION IS AND ISN’T

Posted November 24th, 2009 By: 8 Comments »

In this edition of TA Talks Back, Oretha adresses what the screenwriter has to do to adapt a book to the big screen and why what works on the page doesnt always work on screen.

What an Adaptation Is and Isn’t By: Oretha

I was originally going to avoid this topic but the screams, rants and complaints have just become too loud to ignore. There is this huge argument about whether Melissa has a responsibility to do movie adaptations versus sticking letter by letter true to book. I personally am a huge fan of adaptations. Why? It allows you the opportunity to actually explore things that ran across your mind when you were reading the book.

The screen writer Mrs. Rosenberg in this and the various directors have done a more than fair job by actually giving words to our characters. Surely, you as a avid fan and reader of the book say why couldn’t they just use all the dialog that is in the book. There is plenty. There are good reasons. I will only address three of them.

• Timing: A scene needs to have a certain flow. While your imagination can create every little detail when you read something when you are doing a screen play you need to make the scene move. She gives them lines so that they actually can get from one scene to another.

• Visual cohesion: They have to make it visually engaging as a scene that is just a verbatim from the book would not allow for you to have a feeling. The scene needs to be something that will explain a story if you never read the book and you need to see it. Case in point the arrival of Emmett, Jasper and Alive to dance studio and coming off the balcony. That scene actually told you a few things. It displayed the supernatural talents and it displayed the relationship they had to their brother.

• Derivative Work: is a work based upon an original piece, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. It is a work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications.

Most definitely when you see a novel come to life on the screen they will need to address that just plainly some things cannot and won’t ever work on the big screen. In addition there is reason to be able to change things that should be explained out and seen so that you understand them better. An adaptation is not a verbatim retelling of story. It can’t be, just because of visual, technological and logical reasons.

What do you think, TAers? Talk back to us…







Read More About:
Filed under: TA Talks Back TA Toolbar: Download Here
advertisement
  • Chris

    Good article and thanks for pointing out adaptation and why it can’t be to the letter of the book. I loved the movie! And want to say something about Harry Clearwater but I’m going to disguise it sort of. I think what Melissa did with the character’s fate was brilliant actually. She fleshed some things out for us and it really caused me to think.

  • Maria

    Thank you!! I’ve had the same conversation with so many people who were “upset” at the way the movie was done. When you explain that there is just no way to do the book verbatim due to the time and money it would take just to make it they understand. Plus, it let’s us see how someone else interprets these great books.

  • Sharon

    This is a very good article. I was reading Melissa Rosenberg’s blog entry about the premiere and some of the comments were not only unfair but downright obnoxious. It led me to believe they didn’t have a clue about the difference between a book and a screenplay. I was glad to read this explanation and hope others will, too.

  • heidi

    this is a brilliant post everybody should know there is absolutely no way to make the book verbatim into a movie its impossible and melissa has done great for us as readers.. some books into movies there is not even one line that is exactly the same but she has put several quotes directly in.

  • newborn1863

    Well done. I am so tired,myself of hearing that “this is not how it happened in the book” Well Stephenie Meyer is not the one who is writing a screenplay,so why would it be exact! Ugh!!!

  • Aretha

    Great Article Oretha! Finally someone who is speaking my mind, and response to why some people are upset with film. I LOVE IT!! First off, if people are going to see this and expecting it to be exactly like the book, they might as well stop seeing these movies. I can’t think of one adaptation that has been exactly like the book, bc they only have time tp put in key elements really. I also think the bashing against Melissa is unfair. She has done a very good job with screenwriting these movies, and combining with Chris Weitz in the writing of this screenplay. The way they incorpated things in this movie, such as the dreamcatcher scene, The Volturi fight, hitting Paul, and even the tiny things such as Jacob saying something in Quilette before almost kissing Bella is brillant! So Kudos to Melissa and Chris, and Kudos To Oretha for writing this article and speaking what has been on my mind! T really do hope other people read this article as well!

  • Larissa

    Thank you so much for writing this. I don’t think many people realize that a movie is not going to be word for word. A movie adaptation has to hold it’s own and cover somethings that are covered in 100 pages in the book in only five minutes on screen. Somethings have to be kept out, for time or because then you’d have to add more of such and such to explain. I think Melissa did an amazing job in bringing to life the story on the screen, and New Moon was amazing because it showed so much from the book, but it held at it’s own. I mean of course there are things I wish they had kept just because I really liked it, but going in I know that there’s a huge chance that it’s not going to have everything that I want, I watch it as a movie based on a book that I love.

    Not only does she have to faithfully adapt the book, but she has to make it so people who don’t read or haven’t read it will understand and won’t feel like they’re completely confused all the time. There’s always somethings, but…

    Great article.

  • http://myspace.com/shatterd_hopes Cinderella

    I loved the movie aside from a few parts the frolicing in the woods with vampire bella…she looked like a 12 year old at easter…not at all how i imagined her in BD…in the book when jacob answered the phone he thought it was carlisle and he didnt think he did anything wrong.. in the movie he acted all mean like he knew what he was doing. and the ending… how they just endwith him saying he wants her to marry him… making it sound like a proposal

 

 

 
More in TA Talks Back (9 of 182 articles)