Logo

Valentines Day Ecards

JESSICA’S TWILIGHT MOVIE REVIEW

Posted November 29th, 2008 By: 42 Comments »

Jessica (a TA forum member) has shared her review with us:

So, Last night or should I say early this morning, I went to a midnight showing of “Twilight”. I am an uber twilight fan, a twilighter, a twi-hard, fanpire, whichever you choose to convey the message of a die hard twilight fan. I read all the books, which was hilarious feat for me, because I’m almost 5 years out of high school and have no one else to speak of, no little sisters, cousins, nieces, who are also as into the realm of Twilight. But as things turn out, I fell in love with the books, once I read half way through the first one and then read New Moon, Eclipse and Breaking Dawn in about a day and a half each.

Needless, to say I was into the books. And when all the press for the film was being released (and still is, at this point) I watched and read every possible cast and crew interview, exposé and feature there was online or on TV for me to indulge on my twilight obsessive-ness. I was in great anticipation of the amazing super-natural love story between Bella and Edward to be maximized on the big screen.

And then I did something I probably shouldn’t have. I read the script for the film. Which, I believe is the shooting script they used. I know, I know –It was super-bad of me. Especially, In retrospect, I kind of ruined my experience watching the film. But, At the time, I just couldn’t help myself, but unfortunately I knew what I was getting myself into. Which brings me back to last night and my review of twilight.

First off, since I kind of already knew what to expect, at least story/plot wise, I think I subconsciously started to critique the film itself as a whole. The way I would do other movies, while simultaneously, enjoying every momentous twi-hard revelation and inside jokes. Like the first time, that Robert Pattinson shows up on screen for the first time and I let out a “awwwwwwww” moment with the rest of the theater, or uttering such lines as “and the lion fell in love with the lamb” aloud, seeing Stephenie Meyer’s theatrical debut in the cafe scene and hearing Rob Pattinson’s song in the back round at the restaurant scene, was just utterly great and both distracting at the same time. But, those parts of the film I truly enjoyed, as a fan girl.

And then there is the movie critic in me, whose taste in film is very unique and biased to fine thespians of the trade. Which is not to say that Robert and Kristen weren’t good, in theory as Edward and Bella. Let’s just say for someone, who isn’t Team Jacob at all, I was way to happy to see Taylor Lautner on screen more than I was with any of the Cullens. Kristen Stewart, in my opinion, was never believable as Bella, in part because it seemed, she didn’t get enraptured into playing the part of Bella, as Robert did Edward, he seemed a tad more serious about the material, than anyone else in the whole film, Kristen took herself so serious, Bella was a bit cartoonish, when pleading with Edward. The acting was sub-par outside of the immediate leads, with the exceptions of Peter Facinelli and Billy Burke. I was although quite pleased with the visual flashbacks, when Edward and Esme were turned by Carlisle and when Ephraim Black and The Cullens made the treaty after hunting near the reservation. The Sepia tone, dream like flashbacks were in-fact necessary. Which brings me to the music, actual score for the film wasn’t as dark, haunting and heart-wrenching as it should have been, for this type of love story, Bella’s Lullaby also didn’t fit the mood of the film or what Edward’s feelings were trying to convey to Bella.

The Shaky hand-held camera look didn’t help the cause. Even though the books are voyeuristic in nature. The film I imagined a bit more cinematic in look. Catherine Hardwicke, took the more literal translation of the book and made the Twilight appear more like a documentary than movie, such as with the cases of Hardwicke’s other teen dramas “Thirteen” and “Lords of Dogtown”. I guess which is always a draw back of filming on such a grand scale digitally. Which made the special effects and stunts look cheap and unrealistic. Every time a vampire ran, it looked as if they were attached to wires. The 25 uncalled for close-ups were unnecessary. The film seemed edited haphazardly and the series of events didn’t build a solid foundation for Edward and Bella to be in an incendiary-type love, their feelings almost seemed forced and flimsy -at best. The continuity of the whole movie was just off, especially in the case of how fast the events seemed to happen, which is often the case when book are translated into film. The movie mostly tried to toe-the-line between cinematic epic and low-key romantic fervor, which worked against it most time, because it just made the Twilight seem uneven. I although, still definitely can’t wait to see if “New Moon” does in deed get green lighted. Hopefully, Summit will reach their $150 Million goal and make a better sequel than twilight is as a film. Hopefully, more money will make a big difference in such things as special effects, cgi and god please better make-up.

I know, I will probably get hated on for this review, it might seem scathing, but in truth, it is all out of love for the books and for the love of cinema.

-Jessica
22, West Hartford, CT

What do you think of this review? Do you agree? disagree? why? Talk Back to us…







Read More About:
Filed under: TA Talks Back TA Toolbar: Download Here
advertisement
  • Twilightfreak

    I don’t agree at all. The make-up was like perfect. But, this is her opinion, so I will respect it.
    The problem is that almost if not all people went inside the theatre hoping for the movie to be exactly like the book. >.>
    I went in there just to watch the movie, and leaving the book aside. In that result, I actually enjoyed the movie as a whole. I thought it was fantastic.
    Everything was amazing, in the fact of taking in their budget.
    The actors were amazing and I think that there is so much more in each and every one of the charaters and we don’t even understand how hard it is to act them out.
    I was completely fine with the overall result of this movie.
    I can see that the actors, producers, etc. worked their hardest and I appreciate that, because I can see it.
    I would say so much more, but I don’t want people to get annoyed.
    And, I would love to write a review online, but I don’t know how to do that.
    But, oh well.
    If you read this, then thank you.

  • kristine89

    I completely agree that the editing was very choppy and thus the progression of bella and edward’s relationship particularly in the firsr hour was poorly developed. There was no foundation for their love story. Everything was so forced and haphazard. Although individual scenes were sometimes great (i.e. edward walking bella in the parking lot) the pacing was just off and there was no continuity. It was almost like watching an extra long trailer for a film.

    People have said a second viewing will help, but I did see it for a second time and I still had the same problems with it.

  • Lee

    Jessica, don’t feel bad, I think a majority of fans agree with you, myself included. It did seem a bit rushed. We all know it’s an adaptation of the book, and that the cast and crew were on a time and money budget, which could excuse for the bad wire work and special effects. This story is supppose to be the foundation of Bella and Edward’s relationship, which I think the director and screenwriter did not capture. But now that Twilight has made money, I hope that the special effects are a lot better and that the film doesn’t feel rushed. The good thing is that now they have plenty of time to do the filming. I also hope that they make all the actors read the books in order to get some time of retrospect on what this book is about. They seriously have no excuses. New Moon better rock. I think a lot of fans want redemption. And please no korny lines and bad make up. Hire better people for this production. You have no excuse

  • Eryn Edelen

    I couldn’t agree more. Bravo.

  • AY

    I really liked this review. I agree with everything she said because that’s what I also agrued in my reviews.

  • Michyy Cullen

    Totally, and Utterly diagree. First off, pick a better cast, and I’ll give you a million dollars, do better effects with their budget, and I’ll applaud you. Be more deticated to the book, and I’ll pay you. Pick better music for the movie, I’ll worship you!! The movie was above what I think we all expected. The only thing that could’ve been better, was SOME acting in certain parts. TOTALLY diagree.

  • http://twitter.com/lipgloss712 LipGloss712

    i was so pissed by the time this movie ended. it was made so horribly. i totally cried about it the next morning and i am a 28 year old woman.

  • Twilights My Crack

    I’m guessing this review is after she’s seen it only once. I think the movie gets better after you’ve seen it more than once. It’s her opinion, but I was pretty content with the movie. I watch a lot of classical movies, which disables me from being aware of what special effects are supposed to look like in the year 2008, so I didn’t see anything critically wrong with any parts. Possibly the exception of the fact that I was already familiar with Catherine’s work, which in fact did influence me to think that the movie seemed a bit like a documentary. Other than that, I loved it and I know people who never read the book enjoyed it as well.

  • charlene

    I had the same reaction when I saw the movie for the first time. I was so frustrated. but then again, I watched it for the 2nd and the 3rd time, and quite surprisingly, I grew to love it. :)

  • http://www.jennytonks.blogspot.com Jenny

    I agree–the second time you watch the movie it gets *so* much better. I think you need that first time to shatter your preconceptions, and it is a painful shattering which makes you hate the movie. The second time, you can enjoy it because the preconceived notions of how the movie *should* look (according to your brain) are gone and you are just entertained and delighted! :)

  • mdpcfg

    I have not yet read any of the books, I am hooked on twilight now and want to read them all. I am now a fan. I respect everyone’s opinion and also agree that they could have played better music in this film. Especially with bella’s lullaby many youtube twilght fans have made their own fanvideo with river flows in you by yiruma and I really do think this melody is Bella’s lullaby. Over all I think the films was good and interesting a different approach to what one expect’s from a vampire. And in some way from what I have read from fans and little I know of twilight I basically agree with all your opinion…

  • Tessa

    I don’t think this posted correctly…sorry if it ends up being a double…

    I asked Catherine in a Q&A last week in Los Angeles why she decided to add these extra scenes developing the relationship between Bella and Charlie into the movie while the whole romance between Bella and Edward felt way too fast and unbelievable to someone who hasn’t already read the books and doesn’t have that background info. She laughed, jokingly asked to have me escorted out of the theater, completely sidestepped any answer, and went on to the next question. It was funny and super awkward and kind of aggravating.

  • Jessica

    While I don’t agree with everything you posted about (like the choices of the cast, for instance) I do agree that as a graduate of film school, a lot of the cinematic qualities had my covering my face in dispair. I get that Catherine wanted to make it feel like an intimate portrait, but that could have been backed off on a little bit. I’ve seen it three times now (and agree it gets better with each viewing) but have found that the score really irks me. The heavy guitar riffs just really don’t fit into the overall feel of the movie and think they shouldn’t be used again. While the effects were cheesy, I’m almost willing to forgive them because of the time crunch and the lack of budget. Almost.

  • Amy S

    I am all for everyone having opinions…. But, I just don’t agree. I think Twilights My Crack must have figured it out for me too, I love classic movies so any of the elements that bothered Jessica, really didn’t hit me. I loved and appreciated all the actors and the directors view of the movie. Anyways, I am not hyper critical, I am sure there are some things they could have done better, but I realize what limitations they had. I don’t know what you mean about Kristen, she was great to me. Oh well… You can’t please everyone (although you all really seem to want to be pleased) it just breaks my heart. I do have high hopes for New Moon, I really can’t wait. I really want to know what Stephenie thinks about it all….

  • Amy S

    One thing we all would agree on mdpcfg is the books are the best…. The movie just touches on the books.

  • Joiseymom

    I so totally agree with this review! I went in with very low expectations with everything I heard. I liked the plot (of course), but the director has got to go. OMG all those closeups?? Were they trying to make this an avant garde film?? The camera work was very distracting. And the makeup stunk!! Carlisle looked like a ghost! Yes, they were supposed to be pale…but looking like a corpse??

    I hope they make the second book into a movie, but only if they plan on making it much better!

  • Meg

    I’m really mixed about the film. I saw it twice, and the things that bothered me the first time still bother me but it’s Twilight…I agree with the majority of the things you’ve said here and I must say you’ve said them quite respectfully!
    In my opinion I like the actors they’ve chosen but for some reason it felt to me as if some of them weren’t explored to their extent. I don’t know who to put that blame on be it the screenwriter with the lines, the actors themselves or the direction. I just felt like the characters/actors could have been hmm…more believable at times. There were glints however of them hitting the marks on the head.
    I guess what makes it hard for us “twi-hards” as you say is the fact that we all love these books so much. I know for me, (it may be the same for others) but when I read these books I see aspects of these characters that I connect with on so many different levels and in my mind it doesn’t seem like it would be hard to convey those emotions and feelings but then again I’m not an actor however dramatic my mother tells me I am.
    I am a 24 yr. old woman and proud to be a twilighter and I’m wishing for a fabulous new moon.

  • Veronica

    I agree with Jessica’s review.
    After just having seen the movie for a second time, it was still quite difficult to like. I felt there were too many events out of sequence. There were also too many music-montages, if you will, that minimized Bella and Edward’s romance. The filming was very much in-your-face which was hard to watch. I made sure to sit in the back of the movie theater the second time so I wouldn’t strain my neck or eyes trying to take it all in.

    Knowing what to expect this time, I tried my hardest to push the book from my mind… and failed. With all due respect to everyone involved, it could have been much better. The actors were wonderful. My issues were with the organization, filming and editing. All I can hope for is that the other books in the series won’t be butchered too badly when translated to film. Maybe take a tip from Harry Potter and try a few other directors.

  • She runs with vampires

    Jessica, I’m not mad at you in the least. I agree with you on LOTS of things. I saw it again for the 3rd time lastnight. I had a rare night off sans kids and I could’ve seen a different movie, could’ve hit a club but Twilight Fanpire that I am, I chose my vampires. So, I could see the contacts, saw the microphone, hated the special effects. I was actually ANGRY at Catherine for destroying the meadow scene and felt like the history of the Cullen family should’ve been shown along with a better definition of him playing the piano, Rob never hums the melody in Kristens ear so why did they even bother having a “Bella’s lullaby”? I know that Melissa R. is already on board for New Moon which I am anxiously anticipating, it was my favorite out of the four, but I’m hoping that Catherine either passes or is willing to follow the book more. I think more details of the book can be followed without going over two hours. She’s definitely going to need CGI to morph beautiful Quiluetes into Wolves, don’tcha think?

  • Philboy

    I am a 43 year old woman who has now seen the movie five times. Each time has been a uniquely different experience. The first time on premiere day the theatre was filled with 35 to 40 year old women. I liked the movie, but was utterly disappointed. I saw it again and again and sometimes at night with teens where it felt like a rock concert experience. It depends on the audience. I still think they made some BIG mistakes. The cast is perfect… don’t touch it. I even think Taylor is perfect for Jacob and look forward to seeing what he can do in New Moon. The screenwriter needs to get booted. Why add scenes that don’t exist and delete phenomenally great dialogue that help us understand a truly great love story. We all fell in love with Bella and Edward, so why change what happens? Bella’s lullaby though very pretty is not in any way a lullaby. He wrote her a lullaby. What he is playing and is being played throughout the movie causes tension, not the ability to be lulled to sleep. The special effects are horrific. And very cheesy. Especially when he sparkles. Honestly, Summit should be refunded every dime they gave ILM for the work they did on this film. It is crap. He looks like he is sweating profusely. I still like the movie, but the fans have poured alot of their money into making this film successful, so we deserve to have a great New Moon. Do a great job. Better screenplay, better editing. Less home- movie type film making. We don’t need to see up Rob Pattinson’s nose every three minutes. If Catherine doesn’t do a better job with New Moon, then get someone new for Eclipse. She gets one more chance, but stick to the heart of the story, and stop allowing the story to get away from the main characters. We are there to see what happens to the characters. Don’t invent characters that don’t exist in the book. It’s unnessasary.

  • meh

    This is one of the best reviews ive seen for the movie. I agree completely. Where were some of the key scenes that really showed Edwards mindreading ability, that was one of my favorite parts of the book. Charlie became one of my favorite characters from the movie and so did jessica and both werent at all close to my favorites in the book. And for the love of god the waitress at port angeles was suppose to be stunning and ignored by edward to show how much he likes bella, was it to hard to cast a girl with normal hair. There were too many scenes that were there that could have been filled with better ones and still been a two hour long movie. Just no close-ups where i have to stare at bella’s teeth please

  • Camden

    I totally agree with your review. Being a major fan of the books its really hard to remain subjective. But i hate when people pander and accept everything, just because you’re a fan. Its good to be critical. I have to resign myself to the fact that the movie medium is obviously different and it couldn’t be the book but filmed. I realise the pacing has to be different and they couldn’t include everything i like about the book…I get that. What could have been done better, is the running scenes…it did look rather…umm..cheap, and perhaps stilted? I don’t know why all the tree jumping was required?? I don’t feel it really added to the film, and i feel a more pivotal scenes left out of the book could have been included instead.

    But you know what i had such an unrelenting expectation for this movie, that it would be unfair for me to expect so much, it just couldn’t deliver, no movie could. But i enjoyed it, will probably watch it countless times, and am eagerly awaiting New Moon (which for me personally is my least favourite…but bring on ECLIPSE…which is my favourite out of the four books:)

  • Julie

    I must respectfully disagree with Jessica’s review. I first came to the books after seeing the sneak peek on the Penelope DVD. I read all four books in four days. I’ve read Twilight 7 times, New Moon 3, Eclipse 3 and Breaking Dawn 4. I really love the books. But having experienced the whole Harry Potter thing, I knew that the books would be severely adapted to fit into a 2 hour film. Reading updates on the TA site certainly gave me hints about the direction the movie would take.

    The first time I saw the movie–12:01 am on 11/21/08, I was a bit shocked–mostly by the audience. They were loud, disrespectful and distracting, and it really ruined my experience. I will admit that I was surprised by the film and I wasn’t sure that I liked it. I certainly loved a number of scenes but wasn’t sure how I felt about the movie overall. I saw it again later that evening with my nephew William, his wife Mallory, and my neighbor Paul. Mallory loved it right off. William’s reaction was like my first one. I, however, discovered that as I now knew how the story was played out I really really liked it. My neighbor Paul, who still couldn’t believe his was watching a movie with a audience full of overly excited teenagers, said it was good. As he was the only one of us who had not read the books, I asked him if the movie made sense and he said it did. My nephew, his wife and I saw it again on Saturday and by that time we all decided we liked it. Sure there was plenty to discuss about how things were handled but we really liked it.
    I have now seen it 10 times and I see more and different things each time I see it.

    The pacing of the film I believe is deliberately abrupt. Certainly the first hour was a bit of a head rush but all that had to come along before you could really get down to Edward and Bella coming together. There are a lot of scenes that would have lingered slightly longer in other films such as the scene in the restaurant. But I think by cutting away a hair too soon ( I would have loved to stare into Edward’s eyes a few seconds more) keeps the audience on edge. Yes Edward and Bella are coming together but they are not quite there and a happy outcome ought not to be expected yet. After all every moment Bella is with Edward her life is on a knife edge–at any moment he could snap. And yes, I guess this does make the film seem more of a documentary. But I liked that feel.

    The special effects turned out much better than I expected. Be honest, this film had almost no budget. And I think in the long run, that made the film better. Face it, there are no special effects out there that would have made Edward dazzle us the way he does in our heads. In this I feel less is more. There were just enough special effects to remind us they are not human. The effects were also placed so that they did not take away from the emotional content of the film. Too many directors kill a film by having the special effects steal the scenes away from the actors. I hope that they don’t redesign all the special effects, I would rather they spend it on the sets in Italy–filming those scenes will not come cheap!

    I also don’t feel the close-ups were over done. Much of it was to see the scene as Bella. The audience was Bella in the hospital room and I feel like that gave the scene more emotional impact. Some of the others, I think really worked to show how hard Edward was trying. That his motivation flickered between wanting to kiss Bella and wanting to kill her. I don’t think that would have shown up so well from across the room.

    There’s way more that I could say in defense of this wonderful movie but I will end with my thoughts on the sound track. I love this music. I think that the music really fit the bill. Each piece was well orchestrated with the visual and emotional content of the scene. There was the right music at the right time and there was silence at the right time. Although I had never listened to any of the artists before the soundtrack came out I really enjoy them now. Maybe it is a generational thing. I am 48 and came with no preconceived notions about the songs.

    I think that the perceived unpolished quality of the film is what makes it for me. It makes it a more personal film. It isn’t super shiny Hollywood glossy. Twilight the book is an intensely personal reading experience. You are Bella as you read. I think the rawness of the film makes it equally personal. Can you imagine a Twilight film with Julia Roberts and Brad Pitt and special effects fit for Star Wars? Please God, no! I think people need to let go of their view of the books and just take the emotional ride this movie provides.

  • Brenda

    I’ve seen the movie twice already and I have to say I HATED it the first time I saw it. I’m a huge film buff I LOVE films but I also like books and am and always have been very critical of books that get turned into movies. The second time around I didn’t dislike it as much but I’ll give the critiques of the first time around. The special effects looked B movie. The running looked like it was just fast forward, the tree climbing looked really fake, the sparkling was so not what I expected. The acting seemed very forced and cheesy I actually enjoyed the secondary and tertiary characters better than the leads. “I’m a killer!” that line made me cringe. And the love story didn’t build up enough in the sense that they were feeling too strongly for eachother too soon on film. As the book progressed they showed how the love grew but the film it seemed way too premature. I will say however that this doesn’t in any way shape or form deter me from being a fan, from owning the DVD when it comes out and from actually seeing the movie again. For me the second time around was with a different perspective so I found ways of gleaning things I LOVED from it and making them stand out and yes I still defend it to my friends.

  • Pat

    Pat,
    I have to agree with Jessica and Veronica’s reviews. I saw the movie three times and it was a little better the second and third time but it did feel like a documentary for the first hour of the movie. I was disappointed that they spent more time on Bella and Charlie’s relationship instead of setting up the romance between Bella and Edward. Did Catherine Hardwick read the books before she started directing the cast? Didn’t seem as though she knew much about the book while she added and deleated scenes for the movie. ( I have the movie companion book and you want believe how many crucial scenes were deleated that were in the book for scenes that were never written in the book.) If you had not read the book you were missing a big part of what Twilight was all about(the set up of a forbidden romance). I do think they need to try a different director since it did look as though some of the actors needed direction when portraying certain parts of the movie (example Bella telling Edward she didn’t want to leave him when she was in the hospital). Kristian Stewart seemed to show no emotion, but being frighten instead of being sad in this scene. In some of the scenes Stewart sounded and looked as though she was reading her lines from a teleprompter with little or no emotion.I also agree with Veronica they need to take a tip from Harry Potter since the first Harry Potter film was done with three eleven year old actors and an actress that had never acted on film but the director seemed to get warm and vivid emotions from all these young actors to the extent that you felt like you were really watching what you had just read in the book even though they had to cut some of the parts out. So I have to say get a director that knows what they are doing when it comes to adapting a book into a movie and also find a screen writer that knows how to cut down a book to make it into a film without cutting most of the dialogue and crucial parts of the book out. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was two hours and fifteen minutes and Order of the Phoenix was also the same on film even though the book was 800+ pages (Twilight was only 498 pages). When I left the theater after seeing Harry Potter I felt like I had just watched what I had read the week before. Some of the HP parts were missing or changed but not to the extent that you wondered if this was a movie with the same title as the book but just a different story from the book. This was my pet peave with the movie. It seemed that there was more closeups with music and no dialogue when there should have been more dialogue between Bella and Edward. Also there were unecessary scenes that didn’t need to be in the movie that took the time away from putting some of the more crucial scenes between Bella and Edward that were in the book. Example the scene where the towns people were asking about the murder of the guy in the boat. Why even have the boat scene or the restraunt scene. Makeup was another matter on its on. Some of the vampires looked fine where as some of them did look like ghost with red lipstick on. I just think with another director who was use to adapting a book into a movie these things would not have happen and the movie would have turned out more like a Harry Potter movie or a Daniel Still movie.I hope they reach the monetary goal they are shooting for so they can aford someone like Chris Columbus or Alfronze Curone to direct the second movie. I was disappointed in that this movie didn’t really set up the romance part I thought was the main plot of the Twilight story. Hope New Moon is made better than a bad B movie.

  • Kamille

    i definitely agree with this review. though i think the cast should remain the same, some of them need to invest more time exploring their character (i.e. kristen stewart. that stuttering in the hospital scene gave me goosebumps.. the bad kind). and the story felt way too fast that made bella and edward’s love seemed faked and undeveloped. i mean, for those who didn’t read the book they might be satisfied with that but it just doesn’t cut it for us twi-hards. the special effects were downright cheesy and summit really need to beef up the budget for new moon (please god…). they need a new screenwriter. i am terrified on what she has done with the script for new moon… i mean i get that they need to fit it in a certain time frame but certain dialogue are necessary for the development of the story. but anywho, i saw the movie three times already and i have to say, the crowd definitely makes a difference. if they’re excited you enjoy the movie but if they keep making rude remarks you get so pissed off and wanna throw cans at their head.

    buuuuut, i dont know, it seems like i’m the only person who liked the vampire sparkly effect. i thought it was neat and natural looking. it was different from what i imagined but its somewhere along the lines. ah well. =) great review!

  • Christine

    I completely agree with Jessica. I am totally in love with Twilight, but still have standards when watching a film. I was really disappointed in the cinematography. The constant swooping shots and close ups were really unnecessary. Also, what really bugged me was that Edward and Bella hardly looked at each other. One would look at the other as they stared off into the distance, constantly. This didn’t help the development of a deep connection between them. And the hokey vampire movement effects could have been done better.
    I hope for the next movie(s), they take all the criticism and apply it! I really want the movies to grow.

  • Quinn

    I read the Twilight series in a week-I love the books! I thought they were great. The movie was pretty bad though.
    The first hour was horrible. I laughed out loud at a few parts which weren’t supposed to be funny just because they were so dumb-”hold on spider monkey”, the flying through the forest, Jasper’s look on his face. It made no sense why Bella was not afraid of Edward and why they were saying they were in love. That was not developed in the first half of the movie at all. The relationship seemed fake and confusing. None of the emotions portrayed in the book were present in the first half of the movie. I think it got better after Bella went to meet the Cullen family. I started to like Edward more. I liked the flashbacks especially Carlisle biting Edward. I liked the characters Alice, Emmett, Mike, Jessica, and Edward. I thought they were well-cast. Well, Edward wasn’t all he was made out to be in the book at all, but he was easy on the eyes for sure. Bella wasn’t a likable character in the movie. She just wasn’t believable at all. I had a few problems with technical things like Edward having hairy arms, a hairy chest, and fuzzy sideburns. He was supposed to be hard and smooth. The makeup on Carlisle was bad especially in the hospital scene, his face didn’t match his neck. The special effects were bad. I’m so disappointed by this movie, it seems like it was thrown together. I’m really hoping that the second movie is way better. I did like the cliff hanger ending though.

  • Alyss

    I agree. Twilight is a disappointment for me, or maybe I just didn’t feel it that much.

    Kristen Stewart was such a big turn off because Bella was supposed to be portrayed as “the lamb”, the one who’s vulnerable to anything. KStew looks like she’s ready to handle anything, head on and with ferocity. It didn’t fit. I’m sorry.

    RPattz, Carlisle, Emmett, Rosalie, Esme and Jasper were all good though. For the brief on-screen time with Taylor Lautner, I could tell he was actually good. (The noticeable change in his demeanor when Edward went “I’ll dance with her” or something at the prom is good.) Alice/Ashley Greene looked the part, but didn’t act it well enough for me. (When she started speaking that is.) Even when her having seen stuffs, it didn’t look believable.

    Anyways, I agree with the review. And I don’t hate the reviewer. Haha! She seems to put into words exactly what my thoughts were.

  • Gwendol

    My friend and I went to see Twilight at a Monday matinee. The theater wasn’t full, but had a respectable audience number for a weekday afternoon. I had read a number of online reviews already, and had a pretty good idea what to expect. We both loved the books, but came ready to laugh. And laugh we did.

    Whenever Jasper was onscreen, we howled with laughter. The eyes, the hair. The actor’s motivation seemed to come from a place of “I hope none of my friends see me in this.”

    The corny lines from the book, like the lion/lamb for instance, were even worse in the movie. If they couldn’t be said in a believable way by the actors, they should have been eliminated.

    I keep reading that the movie was really good when you consider that it was so low budget. Wasn’t the budget $40 million? I do believe that would make it squarely middle budget, and not a low budget film. There was sufficient funding to make a much better film. There were no high-priced stars. If there wasn’t enough money for the special effects the director wanted, more of the movie’s “effects” should have been implied rather than cgi, such as the meadow lighting up with reflected prisms of light, rather than the strange and unimpressive effect that was used for Edward’s sunlit skin.

    I think overall, the movie was a failure. A financial success, yes, but it failed to capture the romance at the heart of the Twilight.

    I understand the two leads are asking for $12 million each for New Moon. I think the series would be best served by filling those roles with new actors. These two are not $12 million actors.

    I would love to see a different director and different screenwriter take on the rest of the series. No one from Twilight should automatically be greenlighted for any future film without serious consideration by the producers.

  • Megan

    I have to say I agree with a lot of that review. I was extremely disappointed with Kristen’s Bella. Throughout the movie, I couldn’t help but wonder if she had even read Twilight because she was not portraying the Bella that the world has come to love. Her acting was poorly done and her heavy breathing during the science lab parts and when she and Edward were first interacting with each other just got on my last nerve. It really just made it seem as if she was winging it, not really understanding Bella as a character. However, I was extremely impressed with Robert’s Edward. I had heard that he basically isolated himself for months before filming just to actually nail the role. I must say, it paid off. He was definitely an amazing Edward. I think had anyone else been chosen to play the part, I wouldn’t be able to say that. Even though the special effects were nothing special, I can’t say that it actually matters. I think when you’re as engrossed in the story line as I was, that’s not something you hold high expectations for. I was pleasantly surprised with much of the cast. I was kind of worried about Jasper since the actor seems to have a bit of a creepy look to him but once he took the spot light, I was again at ease. Same with Rosalie. The books got me to HATE her but Nikki got me to love Rosalie. Obviously the movie does not get to me like the books did but how could it? You cannot fit the book into a 2 hour time slot. They got the important parts crucial to the make up of the story and MOST of the actors grasped their characters. I think that makes it a very successful film.

  • Mel

    I loved the movie, it was amazing in itself… but I was kinda disappointed because it lacked the passion that the book had. I mean, with regards to Edward and Bella’s love story. I was hoping that maybe they could have spent I teeny weeny bit of time building the relationship of those two so we could really feel how much they truly love each other. For most avid twilight readers like me (I read the book 4 times already and I’m still craving for more), I believe that what made us fall in love with the story in the first place is how we’ve seen Edward and Bella’s love for each other blossomed, so much so that when Edward said goodbye to Bella in the second book, we also felt her agonizing pain. Another point, I couldn’t imagine anyone playing Bella. Kristen Stewart is the Bella I had in mind and I know she’s a good actress. I just hope she would lighten up a bit (she’s so serious), minimize the stuttering and make it look like she’s mindlessly, bogglingly in love with Edward. But anyway, the film was great and I totally enjoyed it. I’ll be waiting for the sequel.

  • Jessica

    I completly agree with her. It was really weird reading this because it was exactally what was telling my husband. I read the books just as fast and I had really high hopes for the movie, and was let down. Robert Pattinson did a fair job, but I think anyone else could have played Bella better. She didn’t even try to get in character. I would have trouble watching the other movies now if they changed the actress but anyone else would be better. That was their biggest mistake, in my opinion.

  • Caitlyn

    As a matter of fact, I totally and 100% agree with this review. I’m a Twilight freak and have been for the past year. I was hoping that this movie would be better than that the previews made it seem like. I was entirely disappointed. The movie was just TOO fast. But then again I guess I only believe the movie could have been better because I knew the book frontwards and backwards. I think Twilight was a movie to watch if you have never read the books before. I mean.. Some parts didn’t even make sense to me. I mean I understand that you have to cut certain scenes out of a book..but the scenes you DO put into the movie, at least do them right..don’t change anything. Oh well. And the special effects were TERRIBLE. But I guess thats what we get for a low-budget flick. (All the money went to the good contacts. lol) But yeah..overall I’d probably give this movie a 2.5 stars.

  • Katie

    Jessica,

    I just watched the movie last night, and I TOTALLY AGREE with your review. It almost hurt me to watch the movie. Not that Robert Pattinson didn’t look dreamy as I expected, he did, and he seemed to be the only one who had actually read the book. No one else in the film did their characters justice. The acting was awful most of the time (expecially by bella’s friends and somewhat by Edward’s family), the screen play completely jumbled the plot, left out key parts from the book, and added in characters (who was the crack showing santa guy??). The lines from the book seemed to be thrown into the script here and there, without continuity like you mentioned; it never showed how much they truely loved each other which is why this series is so epic. I hope that “New Moon” is better, please!! I hope they have Stephanie Meyer write the script, fire the producer and hire someone much more experienced that is a die hard fan of the series, as well. Maybe then they can capture the true essence of the books on film. I still have faith they can turn it around, and make the love story look epic on the big screan as well.

  • Midori

    Let me just say I really like the movie except for the scene where Edward and Bella are getting to know each other which was not included. In the book they’re asking each other questions, I thought that was important toward their relatonship. How else is he suppose to know Renee and Bella’s life before she came to Forks. The kissing scene was to short even to make a difference. However, Twilight is one of those movies which you can see over and over again. So, here I go again, I know I will enjoy it again.

  • Pat

    I just read Megan’s review and would like to add to my above review that she was 100% right about Robert Pattinson’s portrayal of Edward. When I read the books I pictured Edward as a vampire that didn’t like what he was but had to accept that he was a vampire even though he thought of himself as a monster that was not worth being loved. It was almost as if he had built his own world of hell to live in and felt like he deserved to live a guarded unhappy eternity because of what he was. Robert Pattinson did an excellent job in portraying a tortured soul character and made the viewer love and pitty Edward. He did a wonderful job in portraying Cedric Diggory in Harry Potter as well as Daniel Radcliffe portrayed Harry Potter in the film. I really felt like he carried the Twilight movie on his shoulders and made the good parts stand out more. If he ask for 12 million for New Moon he deserves it for he made Twilight reach the 70 million mark the first weekend it came out. I can’t contribute the great response to the movie to the director’s work or the screen write’s script or Kristin Stewart’s acting. The other actors such as Jacob, Victoria, James, Laurent, and all the Cullens did a wonderful job as well but I do wish Jasper had been given more than one line to say in the entire movie and Alice had been brought out more with more dialogue than she was given in the movie. I think Ashley Green did a good job with the few lines she was given. It must not have been very hard to write the script for each actor since all of them were given few to none lines to say. My hat is off to Robert Pattinson even though he didn’t have as much dialogue as I would have like to have heard. He did have a lot of dialogue in HP and was right on target with his portrayal of Cedric in HP. He did do an excellent job portraying the angst,tortured and the need for love I felt the Edward character had in the book. Thank you Robert for making this film worth seeing.

  • VAL

    i sorta agree with Jessica but the thing that bugged me the most, the make up was terrible, the second time i saw the movie i noticed MOre make-up mistakes. Beside face and neck not matching i noticed one scene with Esme there is about an inch on her forehead down from her hair line that there is a clear line of NO make-up. Other than the make up i really didn’t like Robert Pattinson or Kristen Stewart. Like most reviews they didn’t see to really connect or they were more of a Forced relationship. I’ve seen it twice and the 2nd time was better though i saw it with my family and boyfriend in the back of my mom’s car (drive-in movie, Ennis TX) and we kind of just made fun of it the whole time. it’s really a very funny movie. i did like charlie, and alice was perfect. I love the actor playing Jasper and i think that he should have been Edward, and if you have been following Stephenie Meyer’s web site since before the movie was in the thought process you will see she actually wanted him to play edward. Any way after Twilight was over The Haunting of Molly Hartley played (yay drive-in and double features) the movie was terrible, but i like a few of the actors in it and thought Haley Bennett would have made a better bella or Rosalie(don’t get me started on her) any way i really hope new moon is better ( if you need a new make-up artist i totally do stage and gore make-up) I’m pretty excited I loved Jacob. (though i think for the book i am team edward)

  • Jennifer

    I have to agree with you on many points but I kick myself because I missed so many little things. I missed them because I was so busy laughing at EVERYTHING with my friend. The acting and the story line seemed so out of wack that it was funny. I so did not feel any of the adoring love from Bella. I got a little from Edward and that’s about it. I can say I was thoroughly disappointed. But I definately awwed when Edward entered. haha!

  • midori

    let’s be honest, the movie sucked HARD! you cannot compare the book with the movie AT ALL! i think jessica’s review was being too nice actually. I would have said so much more than that xD i just realized someone called midori also posted a comment…that’s weird…ok anyways, that’s just my opinion if you liked it good for you, if you didn’t, I agree. Rob’s hot but I think he didn’t do very well…and kirsten ahem..right.

  • souled_out_08

    ok, since a lot of other people have written book-comments, i’ll try to keep this short. i’ve only seen the movie once (so far), and i really enjoyed it! i went in figuring there would be differences from the book, and there were – i was ready for them, and generally enjoyed them! yeah, some of the make-up looked excessively cartoonish (such as carlisle’s – loved the acting anyway!), and bella escaping to meet james near the end happened too quickly and easily, but in the end – still good! obviously, as something of a literary purist, i was annoyed with some changes – fairly small ones, but still (bella wearing a tennis shoe with her cast, instead of a stiletto,…). still loved it, and i hope the bigger budget for new moon will go toward something utterly awesome! and as much anti-jacob as i generally am, i enjoyed taylor in that part…

  • Astghik

    Hi totally agree with you. I was waiting for someone to say something about the movie the way I saw it. I agree that the special effects werent all there and that there wasnt a lot from the book implicated in the movie. Also Im sorry to say I am very exceited to see that Cathrine is not doing the other movies. I dont think she was a good choice for the movie; not so say that I didnt like the movie, I loved it but it could have been better. I am just waiting for the other movies to come out to compare them to each other. Exactly what someone said, cant remember, see what happened to Harry Potter, different directors brought some of their own things to the films and made them even more interesting. As for me, I am hoping that it is the Lemony Snicket director, Brad Silbering to be the next director for the films.

 

 

 
More in TA Talks Back (175 of 182 articles)