TWO NEW POLLS: TWILIGHT DVD & NEW MOON MOVIE/ECLIPSE MOVIE BACK TO BACK

Posted February 11th, 2009 By: 13 Comments »

We have two news polls:

Do you think the New Moon movie and Eclipse movie should be made back to back?
-No way, it will ruin them.
-I think so, there are a lot of benefits to doing them back to back.
-Don’t care either way

Have you pre-ordered the Twilight DVD yet?
-Of course!
-Not yet, I’m broke!
-Hale no, too expensive. I’m hoping for an in store sale!
-I think I’ve ordered like 3 copies, just to cover all my bases.

The polls can be found along the right side on every page. Have fun!

Make sure to check out our older poll results:
-When will the hype surrounding the Twilight saga dwindle
-Which is your favorite book?
-How many times will you watch the Twilight Movie
-What did you think of the movie “Twilight”
-Cathrine is not directing New Moon. Your thoughts…
-How do you feel about the talk of replacing Taylor Lautner as Jacob?
-How do you feel about the announcement that Taylor will return as Jacob in New Moon?

View old poll results here

My picks for the polls are that I don’t want the New Moon movie and Eclipse movie filmed back to back. And I haven’t yet pre-ordered the Twilight dvd. What about you? What are your choices?

Read More About:

Filed under: News Blog TA Toolbar: Download Here

Jesse Geluz

i think it would be great to film both new moon and eclipse back to back i think it would be great and im pretty sure as a fan it would benefit the other fans i think its great my personal opinion.
http://theloinsandthelambs.proboards.com/index.cgi Morgan B

If they don’t film New Moon and Eclipse back to back it will ruin the movies. Edward can’t look 17 in Twilight and look 27 in Eclipse. Vampires don’t age so it wouldn’t be right at all >.
http://Hotmail.com Nick

THEY JUST HAVE TO MAKE THEM BACK TO BACK IF THEY DON’T IT WILL RECK THE HOLE LOT AND WHILE THEIR AT IT THEY REALLY NEED TO MAKE BREAKING DAWN IT SOUNDS REALLY EXCITING!!!!
Andrea Amador

I think a good idea to make them back to back because the availability of the actors be insured and also the cant age. Plus the transition from New Moon and Eclipse it doesnt miss a heart beat.
AnaX

What does that means? the back to back thing? I’m sorry i don’t speak english.. just a little XD I understand like 70% but.. back to back?
bebe

it’s okay to make the film back to back. they have too filming edward as soon as possible, vampire don’t ages. and i think, with melissa, script writer in it, it’s all fine.
they have to make breaking down in next years, they have to continue working or we will see the vampires looking old and summit has also keep making real fast the twilight saga to keep the demand and the hype high.. this movie it’s not like harry potter, so, fans should think about it……..
creamy

Yes, back to back. As mentioned, the vamps don’t age. This would be an excellent way to not have the mortal actors look too old for their parts. Of course, if this happened, I would hope the script would not be steam-rollered in the interest of rushing through filming.

I just want to add to that thought. I hope the number of “name” stars is kept to a minimum. Starting with Dakota Fanning. Now that this franchise has some mighty strong money-making legs, every actor in town wants to get their hooks in. Boo Hiss!! We did just fine without all the “A” list help.

Yes, I have pre-ordered one Blu-Ray movie. Will probably order at least one other. Have to cover the bases.
Megan

Yes! I think they should do all the movies back to back. Of course I’ve pre-ordered my movie! The count down has begun!
Jessie girl

Yeah most definitely film back to back. People dont realize how quick actors age. New moon and eclipse are the only 2 books that would work as a back to back film as they follow on.

I heard on some interview that rob wanted them done, all 3 of them, filmed within a year coz of the age and vamps dont age. Also breaking dawn is scheduled to begin production in 2010. So obviously theyre going to have to film NM and E back to back.
Greeneyes

I think back to back because it makes sense. That would bring us so much closer to the wedding.
rachael j

new moons my fave book cant wait for the film. it would be best back to back with eclips, like most of you i totally agree. true, vamps dont age but dont rush it either. with regards to the A listers i think too many would be a bad idea though dakota fanning will be stunning as jane, tho look whats happening to soloman trimble and krys embry! they avnt been called back yet to play their parts (wolves) apparently summit want to re cast the wolves and im asuming it will be for A listers. i love the idea of breaking dawn being a film that’d be awesome but didnt stephenie meyer suggest it would be awkward due to the baby having teeth etc? anyway bring em on cuz i cant wait.
JR

Yes, back to back is great. I can hardly wait for New Moon. Plus the chemistry between the cast memembers is fanastic RIGHT NOW!!!!!
Andrea Amador

I think a good idea to make them back to back because the availability of the actors be insured and also the cant age. Plus the transition from New Moon and Eclipse it doesnt miss a heart beat.