Logo

Valentines Day Ecards

UPDATE: SUMMIT RESPONDS

Posted July 29th, 2009 By: Team Switzerland 95 Comments »

We’re committed to bringing you all updates regarding the current dilemma surrounding the production of the third film in the Twilight saga, Eclipse, and now Summit has responded. If you are not up-to-date on the current situation, you can find Summit’s initial press release here and Rachelle Lefevere’s official statement here. Read Summit’s official response below:

We at Summit Entertainment are disappointed by Rachelle Lefevre’s recent comments which attempt to make her career choices the fault of the Studio. Her decision to discuss her version of the scheduling challenges publicly has forced the Studio to set the record straight and correct the facts.

• Ms. Lefevre’s representatives were advised as early as April that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE was expected to start shooting in early August.

• If Ms. Lefevre was, as she describes “passionate,” about being part of THE TWILIGHT SAGA, we feel that she and her representatives would have included us in her decision to work on another film that would conflict with the shooting schedule of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.

• It was not until July 20th that Summit was first informed of Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to BARNEY’S VERSION, a commitment we have since been advised she accepted in early June. Summit had acted in good faith that she would be available to fulfill her obligations both in terms of rehearsals and shooting availability for THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE. We feel that her choice to withhold her scheduling conflict information from us can be viewed as a lack of cooperative spirit which affected the entire production.

• Furthermore Ms. Lefevre took a role in the other film that places her in Europe during the required rehearsal time, and at least ten days of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE’s principal photography. This period is essential for both rehearsal time with the cast, and for filming at key locations that are only available during the initial part of production.

• Contrary to Ms. Lefevre’s statement, it is simply untrue that the Studio dismissed her over a ten day overlap. It is not about a ten day overlap, but instead about the fact that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE is an ensemble production that has to accommodate the schedules of numerous actors while respecting the established creative vision of the filmmaker and most importantly the story.

The fact remains that Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to the other project – which she chose to withhold from Summit until the last possible moment – makes her unfortunately unavailable to perform the role of Victoria in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.







Read More About:
Filed under: Eclipse, Movie, News Blog TA Toolbar: Download Here
advertisement
  • twilmom

    long time comin, midlife crisis rap, (add your own beat, i have faith, I’ve heard the Beastie Boys today}

    Corporately deft… humanly latent, sign of the times,
    You underestimated the reaction of out Twilittered minds,
    We have the books, Rob has his looks
    (ok, I went on because it rhymes,
    he has talent too
    I saw “Little Ashes[see my review
    ,(TA)}
    I’m sure Rachelle is caught is the middle of this publicity nightmare,… yes, it is..
    you know how money talks,.. adds an in your face,…..undeniable twist,
    let’s call it a wash, kay??
    New Moon with Taylor? Perfect! … nuff said… give us a show!
    Repeat an insult… give it a go!

  • Darcelle

    My heart go out to Rachelle!!!! I will miss you and bealive ladies and gentleman that summit will lose a lot of bussiness!!!!!

  • Kelly

    Ok my questin is how could there be a scheduling conflict i knew way back in last spring that they were shooting eclipse in Aug she should have known to. Its a mess and there is probally no good guy but i just think that she should have known and its sad because this is victorias BIG story and someone else is going to get the credit for doing it.

  • Alison

    People, please don’t give up on Rachelle yet. I know that there is probably nothing that we can do, but we should try. I am hurting for Rachelle right now because I believe that she truly did love the Twilight Saga. Did she make a mistake? Yes. But I cannot even imagine Eclipse with out Rachelle. Please just take a minute to email the people at Summit. There is a list of email addresses above that Ashlie posted. Copy and paste them all in the TO section on you email and let them know how disappointed you are. As we saw with Taylor, Twilight fans do have a voice, and we will be heard if we speak out.
    Don’t give up!
    TEAM RACHELLE!

  • Carry

    I am kind of wondering if Summit is after Ron Howard to direct Breaking Dawn and this is part of the deal. I know that that is probably not fair to say for Bryce, but I am not trusting Summit on this. I don’t have anything against Bryce, but Eclipse will not work for me without Rachelle. Very disappointed!

  • twilightbloom

    I had to dig out my hip boots after reading Summits statement. The BS is DEEP in that statement. No matter what, Rachelle had the right to sign up for other projects just like Rob/Kristin/Peter and others have done since NM wrapped-that’s not unusual. It’s not the least bit odd for Rachelle to think that her 10 days of work on the other project would interfer with her work on Eclipse. And given that her character is central to the Eclipse story line, it’s just petty and (yes, I’ll say it)stupid of Summit to cut her out after all she’s done to promote the franchise. Not to mention that they have now totally pissed me off. And just for the record, I’ve never been a “huge” fan of Rachelle but as an actor she has become the un-living, non-breathing version of Victoria that I love to hate-that says a lot of what I think of her acting ability. Summit needs to get a grip and find a work to bring her back; she has EARNED the right to play Victoria in the segment where she should get to let her talent shine.
    Shame on Summit. Quit acting like babies and more like the studio you want to be by demonstrating a little loyalty to the cast that has MADE you what you are today.

  • dandy

    I’m not going to watch eclipse if rachelle is not in it…they will loose a huge fan :(

  • Elizabeth

    This was definitely an extreme response on Summit’s part. If it had been Kristen or Rob there wouldn’t have been any recasting going on. Summit would have found a way to work around it, which just proves that they could do it. This is when I start losing faith in big buisnesses. If Summit cared they would listen to the fans!

    BRING BACK RACHELLE!

  • http://leasanders.wordpress.com Lea Sanders

    It is unfortunate for the Twilight franchise that both sides decided to publicly air out their dirty laundry. All we see is what was presented. For all we know there might have been some existing animosity between them that boiled up to this point making it easier for Summit to dismiss Rachelle. I’m sure there will be more on this issue to be heard. It really is too bad. Victoria won’t be the same if Bryce plays her.

  • Jen

    Am I the only one who thinks Jim sounds like a Summit lurker?

    Regardless of the particulars of the situation, Jim, at the very least Summit has behaved poorly. The actor was not informed, it was not discussed beforehand, she was sent to Comic-Con to promote the movies with Summit’s full knowledge that they would drop the recasting bomb shortly thereafter. The press release was dropped in the late hours of the night, the rebuttal to the actor’s statement makes them sound childish.

    Summit is in serious need of some rational public relations people, and they owe Twilight fans a major apology for sullying the Saga this way.

  • Dameofthedawn

    I cldn’t agree more!! All of u n specially Amy, PrincessJen, Gretch n dabexter, if there really was any “schedule conflicts” all they had to do was sit&talk to Rachelle who wld, NO DOUBT, walked out of this Barney thing without thinking twice!
    And how quickly they found Bryce, eh?
    Well said, Pat, they’ve done it before with Catherine!
    Shame on u, Summit!
    Let’s go Twination, go Team Rachelle!

  • Erenn

    Jim, it appears to me that you work for Summit! At least by what you say, you have pretty strong feelings for their business practices. I can’t imagine any Twilighter (who didn’t have ties to them) being so hot for Summit without considering Rachelle’s position first. Where did you come from?

    All in all, I smell a rat, and this just disgusts me. I don’t believe Rachelle was trying to hide anything… otherwise she wouldn’t have tweeted her plans or talked about the other movie in the interview earlier this month. And I also agree it seems like Summit is doing this to get a bigger name in. Do they not realize that might ruin the chemistry for the film? If she’s filming the other movie in CANADA (Summit seemed to be pulling excuses from their tuchus by claiming Europe) then it shouldn’t be hard for her (in that 10 days to fly over, meet with the cast and crew and David Slade… get a feel for the project and find where she fits in. Then fly back to finish her other movie.
    They DEFINITELY could’ve worked this out IF they wanted to.

  • Lainie88

    Maybe Bryce really wanted that part and asked Dad to help her out somehow, who knows. We will probably never know.

  • Katie

    I agree with Kelly. We all had a pretty good idea that Eclipse would begin production at the end of August beginning of December with Breaking Dawn, hopefully, starting up early next year. How can she even say that she had no idea. If she was so excited to play this role in the saga, she would never have taken a role without making sure that the times would work. And yes, Summit would wait for Kristen and Rob, but it looks to me like they are more organized and would never put themselves in that kind of situation. They move their schedules, they don’t make other move theirs. It seems like this whole situation is in Rachelle’s hands, no one is forcing her. Why not back out of the other thing since obviously she is already apart Eclipse prior to signing on to the other project, and which one will be bigger and better for her career. I feel this is a no brainer.

  • Suann

    This is a big mistake! It is obvious that Summit did not want to work it out with Rachelle. It reeks of the same pattern of behavior as what occurred with Catherine Hardwicke. Summit Exec’s: There has to be a better way. If this is an indication of how you do business, it’s not acceptable. From the public perspective (me) Rachelle has done a fine job and has supported the movie’s. I can’t believe that this heavy handed tactic is being used again. I do hope the Twi Fandom is energized by this situation. It’s unfortunate, but I am losing interest in the movies and I am thinking – boycott!

  • andrea

    the blame is on rachelle’s management.

    first of all, she shouldn’t have accepted another role so close to the shooting for eclipse. but i think that if the management had disclosed those plans to summit last month EVEN BEFORE she accepted it, perhaps the eclipse crew could have tried to adjust scheduling to accommodate her. they at least could have sat down and talked about how to logistically make it work. but instead, summit was not told until 10 days ago – just weeks before shooting begins – that she would not be available for KEY REHEARSAL and SHOOTING days. that’s simply unacceptable.

    things are already set for eclipse. and it involved way too many people and companies and locations and contracts to go back and re-plan the whole thing.

    summit stated: “This period is essential for both rehearsal time with the cast, and for filming at key locations that are only available during the initial part of production.”

    those locations will not be available for filming once rachelle gets there. not to mention, she won’t be around for rehearsal!

    what was summit supposed to do? there’s not much time left before rehearsals begin.

    it is a very unfortunate situation for everyone involved. it sucks a lot. i’ll be bummed to see rachelle go, and sadly i think it’s too late to bring her back now, but i’m also very excited to see how Bryce will portray victoria. i loved her in the village and i think she will make a great vampire.

    the movies will still be just as awesome, and the world will continue to turn.

    everyone needs to show bryce the same twilight love we’re known for and welcome her to the twilight family.

  • Forever a Twilighter

    All right, I am as sad about this as anyone else. But, it seems that Summit was not notified of this committment in time to accomodate her. They were notified on July 20th and filming begins in early August. It seems that by that time, schedules would be made for filming locations and rehearsals. It seems they would have accomodated her had they known about the conflict. It may not necessarily be her fault, but it seems there was a breakdown of communication between the two camps. Emailing people isn’t going to do anything to get her back. At this point, filming is probably only days away and they probably can’t really change things. Missing rehearsals and set filming dates does seem like a problem.

  • Carly

    I’m not sure why everybody keeps saying that the fans are the ones to suffer. HOW WILL WE SUFFER BY SEEING A BETTER ACTRESS PORTRAY VICTORIA????? Summit has decision to make in order to ensure the best movie possible, and I say, good for them. I totally trust them.

    GROW UP all you petitioners. It won’t change their decision. Promise.

    CONGRATS BRYCE!!! Can’t wait to see what you bring to the role!

  • GlitterInMyHeart

    Its the last movie she’ll appear on.. Couldn’t they just finish it right?
    Ugh very annoyed

  • sandra

    although i would have liked it Rachelle played Victoria… she should have put her Twilight scheduling first and asked the other movie if they could move their schedule… everyone on the cast (with the exception of prob. the main actors Rob, Taylor, Kristen) had to give up other movie deals to work around their Twilight filming schedules why shouldn’t she? BOTTOM LINE she should have worked out the schedule with BOTH movies before committing to something other that Twilight, not after the fact.

  • Rashel

    petition ‘Rachelle Lefevre back as ‘Victoria’ in Eclipse!’ – Summit needs to remember that the fans have made Twilight what it is and the saga has been their largest grossing project…

  • http://www.facebook.com/psychoticdeatheater Kathryn

    Damn, I really loved her as Victoria. Oh well, maybe Bryce will portray her differently.

  • Jane

    This is just really unprofessional on both their parts. I understand there are hurt feelings, but that’s showbiz, baby. Both Summit and Rachelle (whom I love) need to grow up a bit. We do not air our dirty laundry in public, girls – not if we want to keep our careers on the upswing. Don’t believe me? Ask Lindsey Lohan.

  • http://ta gwen

    She had a contractual agreement with Summit, and she broke it. That’s the real world, guys. You don’t work at one place, then suddenly say sorry, can’t do that, gotta go here for ten days; so all the people, who DID work that agreement into their very busy schedules, can just go to hell. That’s not what I call commitment.

  • Tatiana

    I follow the thoughts regarding these matters:

    - It’s still missing the third side: the truth.
    - Both sides are wrong and being childish. The two statements are a perfect match if you read it. Rachelle got a new movie and she didn’t tell Summit. She thought it wouldn’t be a problem, as Summit accomodate other actors’ schedule before. Summit was mad at Rachelle because they wanted to be informed of it previously. It means they wanted her to ask for their blessing before, right? Whatever. Both playing childishly and saving their a**es trying to appeal good to the fans.
    - It’s all about money. Who didn’t know it should have known it better. It’s all about money for Summit, it’s all about money for Rachelle.
    - The fans are the only ones who are being truly affected by this. But did you really expect that Summit would make a decision like that and would submit it to a public poll? They would never think in asking the fanbase opinion. Victoria is a secondary role till now, so she can be replaced – that’s a business thought.

    I won’t sign petitions, I won’t send mails, I won’t post in my twitter, I won’t take my time with that. I’m sorry but that’s my attitude – being the most reasonable and not taking sides. I will miss Rachelle and I wish good luck for Bryce.
    My love for the saga isn’t related to Summit or the movies so I will try to move on. They don’t care for us so badly.

  • Rashel

    Please sign this petition ‘Rachelle Lefevre back as ‘Victoria’ in Eclipse!’ – http://301.to/625

  • Melissa

    if they wanted to have Ron Howard direct breaking dawn, why not have his daughter in breaking dawn…ugh so many rumors are going to be flying around. maybe the maddness will become too much and they’ll take her back. Summit is nothing without us fans.
    BRING BACK RACHELLE!

  • denise

    The majority of the reactions on this blog are completely juvenile. Welcome to Hollywood kids! Bottom line: It’s not personal, it’s business. I’m sad to see Rachelle go, but have no doubt that Bryce will do a phenomenal job in this role. How about we stop whining and be positive? I’m excited to see what Bryce brings to the character.

  • RobinEA

    I sent emails to all Summit Execs. I received a response from Nancy Kirkpatrick first thingthis morning (6:42 AM). Basically stating what a horrible experience this was for Summit and how they were misused by Rachelle. Per Nancy’s email the job Rachelle took was completed in early June.

    Based on this response, this is what I read into it. Most likely Nancy Kirkpatrick is the designated spin doctor for this topic. The response is a canned response. Corporate America does not allow any written responses to go out to the public that have not been cleared through the business machine. (I know how this works as I was a VP for a Fortune 500 company for 11 years.) They state that the last 10 days have put them under a great strain.

    Things to think about: Does anyone honestly believe that this large movie giant, was totally blindsided by Rachelle? Remember that rumors travel faster through the movie community than any other business. Does it seem strange that Rachelle’s scheduling conflict only became know to Summit Entertainment conveniently after Comic-Con. This way they were able to make their appearance at Comic-Con and avoid the bad press it would have caused if the fans had known about the casting replacement during the general meeting. Does anybody believe that Summit was not already in talks with Bryce Howard and were just waiting to issue the press release to fit their needs.

    The way to send a message to Summit is through their pocket book. By all means support the books, but think twice about supporting the movies. Read the books again if you need an Edward/Bella fix.

  • Jackie

    PEOPLE- FANS, PLEASE CALM DOWN! This is not SO tragic, you all are acting as if they were recasting one of the Cullens, Bella, or Jacob and the pack. This will not end badly. Bryce is a very good actor and I’m sure we will all think she does a amazing job. Please try to be optimistic here.

  • acacia

    I am not confused and I know exactly who to believe. COME ON people! Do you really think Rachelle, a virtual unknown up until Twilight, would willingly and maliciously deceive Summit and forfeit her job for an indie flick? PUHLEEZE! Summit obviously wanted to replace her and is using this “scheduling conflict” as an excuse to do so. This was Rachelle’s movie–would she really trade all that screen time for a role in a film hardly anybody will see? In EVERY interview she has ever given she seems to be enthusiastic and humble about her role in Twilight. Now weigh that against a bunch of suits who only care about making money…

  • Leonna

    The facts are that Bryce Dallas Howard is essentially her own name, she’s a golden globe nominated actress and she’s been in a few box office hits (Spider-Man 3 and Terminator Salvation). When it came down to the wire either David Slade didn’t want Rachelle or the studio no longer thought she was right for the movie, because she’s basically unknown outside of the twilight films.

    In the end, of course they don’t really care about what the fans think…or they would have worked around Rachelle’s 10 day schedule out of a 3 month shoot.

    And, the speculation about having Bryce Dallas Howard’s dad, Ron Howard direct Breaking Dawn is B.S., any REAL studio would know that Ron Howard just doesn’t direct anything. he’s passinonate about all his projects and 99% of the time, works with the same production crew, from his production company (imagine entertainment) and producers, like Brian Grazer for example. which means, most, if not all of the twilight saga production crew and producers would be out of a job, which isn’t going to happen. plus, Ron Howard has about 4 different film projects he’s working on right now for the next 3 or 4 years.

    hey, but you never know. I call foul on David Slade or Summit alone for wanting, technically, a “Name” actress.

  • carie

    I think Bryce Dallas Howard will be phenomenal, I liked Rachelle in interviews and stuff, but I don’t think she was that good an actress, she was a little over the top in twilight with her evil tense eyes.

    Bryce will be great, so here’s to the twilight series becoming better.

  • Lisa R.

    It’s not like we’re going to boycott the movie. Let’s just go with the change.

  • Renee

    TEAM RACHELLE!
    I could care less what Summit’s BS reasons are. I cannot stand it when actors are changed half-way through a series. The fact is I WILL boycott Eclipse. It was never my favorite anyway. I want Rachelle back!

  • Janicia

    Rachelle should have known better than to start filming two movies at the same time and think that’d she could do both, reguardless if if it was only a 10 day shoot. It’s a blessing in disguise anyway for her.

    Who in their right mind would turn down a movie with Dustin Hoffman and Paul Giamatti? No offense to other twilighters, but twilight is not “The Godfather”. Everybody knows that good indie films tend to bring praise and awards down with them.

    Summit just jumped at the opportunity to have a better known actress play Victoria, can’t blame them.

  • Janicia

    Rachelle should have known better than to start filming two movies at the same time and think that’d she could do both, reguardless if if it was only a 10 day shoot. It’s a blessing in disguise anyway for her.

    Who in their right mind would turn down a movie with Dustin Hoffman and Paul Giamatti? No offense to other twilighters, but twilight is not “The Godfather”. Everybody knows that good indie films tend to bring praise and awards down with them.

    and Summit just jumped at the opportunity to have a better known actress play Victoria, can’t blame them.

  • Megs

    As much as I hate it when movie corporations change up their actors in sequels I do agree with Janicia in the respect that Rachelle should have known better than to start two movies at the same time and think that she could to it.

    However, I feel like this is becoming a “he said” “she said” thing and that’s not good. I don’t know the new actor who is going to play Victoria in Eclipse well, but I’m sure she’ll bring something new to the screen.

    But I do wish Sumitt would have decided to work things out a little more with Rachelle and her schedule. And not just jump at the moment to cast somebody new.

  • TinaOh

    if it is true that she double booked herself, then that is not right. However, I know they specifically shot all of ‘James’s’ scenes first, in twilight, because he had conficts. In the end though no matter who we complain to, it won’t matter. We need to start accepting that Bryce will be Victoria. She is a very talented actress, so as much as we miss RL, let’s be fair and not slam Bryce for something that is not her fault. This is between Summit & RL.
    ‘What we have hear is a failure to comunicate.’ (is anyone on this site old enough to know where that came from, or did I just give my age away!?!)

  • Addicted to Edward

    why in the world should Summit listen to the fans?

    What was the reaction when Robert Pattinson was first cast as Edward Cullen? And where is he now? A major heartthrob and the majority of the fans LOVE him as Edward.

    What was the reaction when Catherine Hardwicke was replaced? And look at all the wonderful things Chris Weitz has done with New Moon. New Moon is looking to be SOOO much better than Twilight. (I loved Twilight the movie, but only because it was Twilight.)

    I’m not thrilled about David Slade but willing to give him a chance.

    Now that said, I’m very sad about Rachelle Lefevre being replaced. It sounds like she and/or her management team made an error in judgment, but why aren’t Summit AND the other movie’s company willing to work with her on a solution? It makes me feel that Summit and/or David Slade was already thinking about replacing her (and who to replace her with), especially given how quickly it all happened.

    The bottom line is, it’s not going to stop me from seeing Eclipse, and I’ll bet the same is true for the vast majority of the fans. (anyone not going to see New Moon because Sam and Embry’s characters were re-cast? Yeah, I thought so.)

    And I have to wonder what the reaction will be after Eclipse comes out. Will there be a 180-degree reaction from fans like there was with RP and CH?

  • Emiline

    It seems to me that there might have been another issue behind this… That maybe Summit realized this role was pretty huge, and didn’t think Rachelle was up for it. She is a relative unknown, unlike Bryce, and maybe they wanted someone with a more impressive resume…
    This whole thing just sounds so PICKY. Like Summit was LOOKING for a reason to fire *ahem* recast Victoria. Like they wanted something to tell the press and public without having to forthrightly attack Rachelle’s talent. It all comes down to money. If Bryce is a better actress, she does a better job, they sell more tickets. Cha-ching! And the fact that they apparently didn’t even contact Rachelle with a warning, not giving her a chance to drop Barney’s Version and be free for those irreplaceable, inflexible 10 days, supports my theory that they didn’t actually care about the scheduling, they cared about the $$$$ that would come from a more experienced actress. Dont’ get me wrong, I really like Rachelle! But I’ve never seen her in anything besides Twilight.
    It makes me sick that books we love so much has come to this.

  • Jim whos now steamin mad

    Alright..I spoke my thoughts and apparently some of you didn’t like what I had to say and had to resort to childish retorts.

    Look, I don’t work for Summit. But I enjoyed the backlash my comments have gotten. I rarely post here and when I do, its usually just for information. I happen to work for a movie theater and I enjoy Twilight (the books more than the movie, but the movie was good). I get some info a bit early on trailers and such in my job. I try to help out fellow fans (although I’m obviously not as RABID as some) and give info. I saw a topic that I had a different point of view on and decided to jump in with apparently some bad results.

    “Jim, it appears to me that you work for Summit! At least by what you say, you have pretty strong feelings for their business practices. I can’t imagine any Twilighter (who didn’t have ties to them) being so hot for Summit without considering Rachelle’s position first. Where did you come from?”

    I appreciate healthy debates and the sharing of ideas, but I don’t appreciate being called out in this manner.

    Seems like some fans can’t take the reality of the situation. I’m a realist. I’m not hot for Summit. Apparently the love for Twilight for a lot of fans clouds the obvious answers to the business world and how things work.

    I will say again…I think it was crappy of Rachelle to think the movie timeline could be tweaked just for her on such short notice and not tell Summit until just a few weeks before shooting. I think it was crappy of Summit for ousting her in such a public manner. I think they’re BOTH childish for the bull that’s going on now.

    But what’s done is done. Bryce is in…Rachelle is out. There’s not enough signatures in the world to get Rachelle back in the film at this point. Its too close to filming and they’ve got another contract on the film to fulfill by signing Bryce. Face facts folks, when it comes to the final showdown with Victoria, it’ll be Bryce you’ll be seeing and not Rachelle. I’ll say again…I like Rachelle but its just how its gonna be.

  • Jamie

    Jim – no worries. I liked your thoughts from the beginning. I think people were just in the heat of the moment. :)

  • Ben

    Wow there are some real immature people on this board. The fact is she made a decision (obviously not a smart one), the producers had alerted all the actors of the impending schedule for a eclipse but left them a little time before shooting to maybe fit in a role or two. Now speaking as a professional actor (who has worked on a film or two) you have to be wise when you make these decisions because there is a business side to acting and 90% of it is TIME MANAGEMENT and the reality is that a shooting schedule CANNOT be altered once completed because you would lose a lot of money and on a big production like this you would probably lose a couple thousand a day because of rescheduling so this is no joke people. I do agree that Summit may not have handled it professionally but you have to realize that they are a greenhorn production company from what I’ve heard and they are rushing shooting schedules (they probably don’t want potential movie goers to lose interest) so if you are aware you can’t shoot a role to close to filming why would you sign on?

    One last thing a lot of people have been giving Summit flack not just for this but for many other ridiculous reasons that I can’t remember and the funny thing is at the end of the day all these so called fans (or Twi-hards) are going to see the film regardless, I’m not trying to say fans of this series are unintelligent because then I could say the same about the Spiderman fans (God the last two films were horrible!) but seriously people lighten up! And besides if Bryce Dallas Howard turns out to be terrible at least you’ll see Jacob Black and Edward Cullen shirtless.

  • Twilight4Eva

    like some others have said summit did obviously not bother it out, i think they will definately loose some money as rachelle would have been a cheaper actress, and as some people have said they will not see the film if rachelle is not in it, they obviously thought higher profile actress = will need to be paid more but in the long run more people will see the movie. what idiots, god some of these summit people should go online and check out these polls and petitions we awesome twilighters have, saying get the heck ridof bryce and bring back rachelle. people don’t like change, and as someone else said i also wouldn’tbe very surprised if her dad is one of the people who they just happen to consider as a director for breaking dawn, even though that would be stupid on their part cause all that would do is certisy and give us real proof of what we already know. then soo many more people will be angry. christ its only a 10day overlap summit your filmign for like 3 months ot would probs only take like 1-2 weeks out of 12 to film rachelles part and you could probs bet that the overlap wasnt when she was even suppsoed to be filming or rehersing either since it is such a short time.
    go and sign a petition like i just have dont give up
    TEAM RACHELLE

 

 

 
More in Eclipse, Movie, News Blog (4604 of 7647 articles)