Logo

Valentines Day Ecards

VARIETY: STUDIOS PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY FOR 2010, INCLUDING NEW MOON

Posted January 21st, 2009 By: 11 Comments »

Variety.com Last fall, studios were bullish with plans to put 40 or more films in production to fill 2010 and 2011 slates. The majors might still meet that goal, but it hardly feels like a bull market so far.

 
Studios are proceeding cautiously as they wait for the SAG dispute to play itself out. And they are using economic hard times to slash talent salaries to the point where, even when the business is back, it won’t nearly be the same as it used to be. They are working through the volume of pre-strike films they put into production in early 2008 and are still in need of product for 2010 and especially 2011.

“Studios are telling us, we need movies, but they want us to proceed with projects without spending money, and without actually pulling the trigger and making commitments,” said one studio-based producer with projects in limbo. “Producers have been wedged into this netherworld where it’s like hurry up and wait.”

An unanticipated aspect of the preparations to line studio slates is the bruising negotiations now associated with every picture, as studios seize on talent salaries and gross participation as items in the budget that are not fixed costs, and where they finally have some leverage.

“Box office has been strong, but many of us feel that studios are using the strike and the economy as an excuse to get into long-desired conversations about gross and final cut,” one agent said. “Talent and their unions opened a Pandora’s box, and it feels (as if) there is a new world order out there. You hope the business will get back to normal, but we fear this may be the norm.”

The stars of “Twilight,” Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, who are still in talks, will likely cash low-seven-figure upfront paychecks for sequel “New Moon.” They likely won’t, however, be allowed to sink their fangs into first-dollar gross as they hoped. That film’s financier, Summit, hasn’t yet paid first-dollar gross and sells off its foreign territories. One possible compromise is bonuses pegged to box office performance.

Dealmakers said studios that once bought projects that could be bait for movie stars now prefer high concepts that don’t require big stars and directors with their big paychecks. The perfect example is “Twilight,” which became a big hit despite the lack of bankable stars.

“There is no such thing as a quote anymore,” said one agency chief. “You tell them your client’s quote; they smile and say, ‘Here is the offer.’ Even when you agree on a deal, it’s harder to get the trigger pulled, with more signoffs than in the past.”

In every segment of the film community, the current feeling of paralysis brings with it a high level of anxiety. Studio executives, under orders from above, are driving the hardest deals in memory and eviscerating the backend deals of stars and directors (who are also being challenged on final cut). Writers have been cut to a fraction of the quotes they received before the WGA strike.

Lit agents who last year attributed lowball writer offers to studio bitterness over the 100-day writers strike now feel that discounts are permanent. Writers who once got $500,000 for a script and a set of revisions now receive $300,000 for a draft, with no guarantee they’ll be asked back for a second pass. The spec script, pitch and book markets have been sluggish.

Complete article here

(thanks Sarah)

After what Twilight made at the box office, Summit can afford to be generous with the cast. I hope they’re fair about salaries and how much money is necessary to make New Moon a success.

I worry that with the tough economic times, New Moon will be negatively affected including the script, the cast and all the production costs.

I worry most because I saw how theY cut corners with Twilight and I was really hoping, after the box office take, that Summit would realize how important it is to be more generous with New Moon.

I hope that negotiations work out with Rob and Kristen. New Moon would suffer badly if it didn’t work out.

What do you think? Do you have the same worries? Or do you think it will work out fine despite the issues with the economy?







Read More About:
Filed under: News Blog TA Toolbar: Download Here
advertisement
  • antigone

    LOW seven-figure checks??? LMAO! how is anything with seven figures considered low? that is ridiculous. the kind of money that actors/actresses make is absurd.

  • Angela

    Well, if you look back in 1930s, when the World was supposed to this Great Depression, that was the era in which some of the best movies of all time were made (Anyone have seen Gone with the Wind?). I think, perhaps, the bad economy would allow studios to try new things, to try new methods, to make movies. I think it would be good for up-and-coming people — they have nothing to lose anyway.

    I hope that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson would not turn down to do a movie because of the dollar figure. You can spend all the movie in the world to produce a rubbish movie.

  • Angel

    As long as the studio is fair about how much of a “cut” they give these kids, I’m fine. Most importantly… I just want great movies from our Twilight series. Period. Twilight was…good- but we want GREAT! I totally believe that can be pulled off if the studio backs off and lets the actors/director do their thing (respectively).

  • neetabug

    I’d like to think that if actors and directors were expected to take a pay cut, then the studios would too. That doesn’t seem to be the case with Summit though.

    …and yes, I’m very worried about New Moon. All I see is Summit cheerfully accepting the dollars they’re raking/will rake in, without wanting to put anything back.

    As for the inference that low 7 figures is unreasonable, look at what’s happened to Rob. Because of promotional commitments for Twilight and then the timetable for shooting NM, he hasn’t been able to accept any work since shooting Twilight.

    I’ve seen a lot of figures floated for what he was paid to do Twilight, but I tend to think (considering the budget for the movie) that the earlier figure of $600,000 is the more accurate, which is pretty paltry for such a successful movie.

    Recession or not, Summit is looking more and more like Scrooge McDuck every day to me.

  • Carly

    Yeah, I have the same worries mostly about the budget for producing the movie. I hope they don’t cut corners. I think Summitt needs to realize that they are paying Rob and Kristen not only for their work on the film, but also all the media and promotion crap they had to go through with Twilight. I mean, being sent to different cities to be screamed at, countless interviews, crazy hours, etc. That’s gotta be extremely draining and they deserve compensation for that time as well.

  • Caitlin

    The more I’m hearing about Summit, the more upset I’m becoming. Worldwide, Twilight’s made over $300,000,000–Robert and Kristen are entitled to more than $600,000 (especially because of the promotional crap) and New Moon’s entitled to a much larger budget. Twilight wasn’t bad, but there’s definitely room for improvement–something a larger budget will help fix.

  • Kijo

    I know many of us have heard the phrase “You don’t bite the hand that feeds you,” but I agree that these young actors deserve a larger cut this time around. They have put forth crazy amounts of time, energy, and sanity to be caught up in the world that is Twilight! They know how much we love them for doing this and I think that’s what drives them (the actors) to do it. Yeah, they make a living doing it and a pretty darn good one if you ask me. But, they HAVE to put up with a lot of mental anguish that comes along with this job as well. Good luck to the actors of New Moon; it sounds like you have a cynically tight-wadded studio on your hands! We just want an AMAZING movie to see!

  • Erika

    Everyone who had posted before me – I gotta say…you nailed it! You really put what was needed to say. Thank you. With all that interviewing and appearances, they all need that amount of money that is due to them at least an additional $100/$200k. Vancouver, BC, probably cheaper to film there than Portland or Forks, or LA. Why Rome?! I would think that ROME would be far more expensive than filming in actual Volterra. Cutting corners will show-up in the end. I’m sorry I’m getting off-track, but all of you get the idea. I hope they found some better contact lenses that will not irritate Robert’s eyes or any of them. Put more money into better quality products for the stars so they won’t have this vision problem. Summit – fans no, anyone who enjoys going to the movies will slap down our $10 (or so) to see a movie–whether it is from the Twilight Saga or not. Do not underestimate what we do with your childish and greedy smugs. Without us, there wouldn’t be an industry in movies (or TV, stage, radio). I’m getting too sick over this. I can’t wait til I see Little Ashes!

  • midfan

    How does the promotion thing work? Anybody? Did the cast get extra pay for all the photoshoots, interviews outside the press junket, mall tours??? Summit is in the business to make money, so they can stay in business to make more movies, but hopefully they will be fair with this cast since Twilight made more money than all of Summits other releases so far combined. It’s a two way street, most of this young cast felt lucky just to have a job when they were cast in Twilight (Rob included – he said at the Austin Film Festival he’s pretty much done every job he’d been offered since HP – all of what 2 small movies and some BBC TV work). Now they are all getting offers. On a related note – why Dakota Fanning for Jane? She will demand a higher salary than a relative unknown and they don’t need STARS to sell New Moon now that Kristen and Rob are stars in their own right. They can put the money into better script writing/effects. One last thing, Cam, Jackson, Kellen, Ashley, and Kristen all did other projects during summer/early fall – why not Rob? I know he did a lot more promotion but it seems he could have done a small movie in there? Just curious. I know Kristen said at one point she really wanted the Joan Jett job but it was up to the business men whether she’d get to do it even after being offered the role – it must be frustrating to have so little control over anything you do – no wonder so many actors want to produce/direct too.

  • Midori

    Well, I haven’t been to the music in years. There was really nothing worth my time to watch until Twilight came along. I read all the books, and thought myself…this is worth going to see. I must admit I saw it about six times. I loved the movie! However, I believe New Moon is going to be a toughter movie to make with the Volturri in the story. I do hope they film it in Italy at the actual clock tower, that would be amazing. I think Summit needs to expand their budget for New Moon, they made more than enough on Twilight. It just a little more money to make a better movie. Also, on Rob’s contacts, I hope they find another solution so he doesn’t have to suffer on a daily basis. Ugh! He is such a professional. When think of New Moon I think about Palazzo dei Priori (clock tower), that scene is going to be so amazing. It is in the book. What Bella goes thru to save Edward…incredible!

    On Little Ashes, I believe it is best to read Salvador Dali’s story so you can appreciate the story of his life. I can’t wait to see it!

  • Amie

    If I recall reading previous articles online correct, Rob (and possibly Kristin) is in a three-movie contract. And last I heard, he was given a $10 million raise for New Moon (he made $2 mil for Twilight). If that’s true, then we are at least guaranteed an awesome Edward through Eclipse.

 

 

 
More in News Blog (6054 of 7413 articles)